'Step back and give officers space and time' to work with Highlands' ELC providers
Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.
Highland councillors yesterday voted down a plan to create a dedicated board for early learning and childcare (ELC) partners.
Instead, education committee members meeting at Inverness headquarters agreed to 'step back' and allow officers to continue to negotiate payment rates for the ELC sector.
Councillor Helen Crawford – who has heavily lobbied for an uplift in ELC rates – tabled a motion to establish an ELC partner board.
This board would have included eight elected members and five ELC sector representatives.
Councillor Crawford told the education committee the board would strengthen the sector and give councillors a strategic overview of the council’s relationship with its partners.
However, the motion was defeated in the vote.
Row over ELC payment rates
The council recently found itself in the centre of a row over the amount it paid to independent and third sector ELCs.
Highland ELCs said the previous rate of £5.43 was not sustainable, and fell well below what it needed to pay its staff the Real Living Wage.
Some called for an uplift to £7.25 per hour, in line with recommendations from an Ipsos Mori report.
However, the council said it could not afford such a substantial increase.
Instead, members recently agreed an increase for ELC providers of 32p per hour for three to five-year-olds and 53p for two-year-olds.
It also agreed to pay £3 for each nursery meal, up from £2.30.
Both raises are being backdated to August but only apply to the current financial year.
In the meantime, next year’s ELC rate will form part of the council’s budget discussions in the spring. A wider redesign of ELC services is still under way.
‘Misinformation and miscommunication’
Councillor Crawford’s motion attempted to give councillors stronger oversight of the process.
The sector has heavily lobbied councillors on the rates issue.
Councillor Richard Gale seconded the motion, stating that the debate to date had been plagued with 'misinformation and miscommunication'.
Education chairman John Finlayson strongly refuted that suggestion.
Councillor Finlayson asked why the council needs a separate partner board. He said the creation of such a board would simply create silos.
Councillor Drew Millar backed him, observing “We already have a cross-party ELC board – it’s this education committee.”
In a bullish response, Councillor Finlayson tabled an amendment instructing councillors to 'step back and give officers space and time' to work with ELCs.
This was passed by 13 votes to Councillor Crawford’s eight.
