NFU Scotland challenging creation of new national parks
Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.
NFU Scotland has repeated its opposition to the creation of new national parks in Scotland.
They said this is based on the experience of 'many farmers and crofters' currently living and working in either the Cairngorms National Park or the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park.
Earlier this week, union vice president Alasdair Macnab chaired a meeting on national park proposals on Skye organised by the local NFU Scotland office and attended by 110 farmers, crofters and other local stakeholders.
All attendees indicated that they did not support the creation of a national park in their area.
The union said in recent consultation with members, responses indicated that existing national parks had failed to make a positive contribution to farming and crofting.
Specifically, the majority of members felt that the creation of new parks would:
• increase bureaucracy and stifle growth, innovation and development;
• increase access-related issues;
• reduce housing availability for the local population;
• bring no additional benefits over and above existing policies and legislation; and
• prioritise tourism and visitor access over local farming businesses to the detriment of the rural economy and the natural environment.
NFUS is calling for independent evidence of the value that existing parks bring to farmers, crofters and the local community.
Mr Macnab said: “Farming and food production are highly important to Scotland’s rural economy and are the key drivers of the local community and landscape management that draws in other opportunities.
"This must be a major consideration when assessing nominations for new national parks.
“Meaningful involvement of the local community at each stage in the nomination process is key but that is not being delivered by many of the proposed bids.
"Feedback from members in existing national parks is that there has not been enough focus on local views and where community involvement was present, it was tokenistic.
"That must not happen this time round.
"Wider community views must be considered and not just the nomination group views that are presented when bids go in for the creation of new parks.
"This is necessary to avoid polarised views within a community leading to groups feeling disenfranchised and that a national park is imposed on them.
“In the concerning absence of any detail on how new national parks are to be funded in the face of the current national fiscal pressures, and the potential that another layer of complexity and bureaucracy will be laid on farmers and crofters, we believe the means to achieve the same outcomes are already in place and the benefits should be shared across the whole country.
“The nomination process for new national parks is causing a lot of concern and confusion for members with regards to what it means for them and their area."
Nominations for a new third Scottish national park will be judged based on a set criterion.
A consultation on these criteria was open between May and June, last year.
