Highland councillors line up to slam 'ridiculous' Westminster constituency boundary proposals for region
Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.
There was a rare show of unity in the Highland Council chamber yesterday as members queued up to denounce the latest Boundary Commission proposals.
The new Nairn, Strathspey and Moray West County constituency would lump the strath in with Elgin and wider Moray as well as Nairn. It splits Moray into two constituencies.
Highland councillors unanimously agreed to fully reject the changes to the region's constituency boundaries which they said rode roughshod over local bonds.
The Boundary Commission is tasked with reviewing the UK’s parliament constituencies. The body is gathering views on its draft plans, with consultation due to close on 5 December.
Plans would split four Highland Council wards
The Boundary Commission has grouped together Highland, Moray and Argyll and Bute to create four proposed UK parliament constituencies.
Under its other proposals, south Lochaber would be added to the whole of the Argyll and Bute council area in a consistency named Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber County.
The proposed Inverness-shire and Wester Ross County constituency would include Inverness, Fort William, Skye and part of Wester Ross.
Finally, the entire northern half of Highland Council would fall under the proposed Caithness, Sutherland Easter Ross County constituency.
If agreed, the proposals would see four Highland Council wards split apart and MPs straddling different local authorities.
It sparked a strong reaction from councillors across the chamber in Inverness yesterday.
Related article:
Badenoch and Strathspey to be lumped in with Moray in electoral boundary shake-up
Highland Council convener and Badenoch and Strathspey member Bill Lobban did not hold back in his criticisms.
He told the meeting: “Not for the first time we see Highland treated as nothing more than an after-thought for an unrepresentative Boundary Commission.
“These proposals – which include reducing the number of elected representatives – will massively increase the democratic deficit our remote communities already feel.”
He continued: “Far be it from me to question the impartiality of the Boundary Commission but someone less charitable than I could suggest that this was designed with rather more political ramifications than they’re prepared to accept.”
Councillor Lobban called on the council to reject the proposals with whatever means available.
Inverness member Alex Graham summed up the mood when he said: “This is one for the bin.”
Council to fight proposals with any means available
Councillor Jackie Hendry opened the debate by highlighting the impracticality of the plan.
She said: “If the boundary proposals proceed, we will have four councils wards that will be split – wards five, 12, 17 and 21. This will lead to a split to communities, and confusion.”
For example, Councillor Hendry painted a scenario where Fort William wanted to bid for UK economic funding.
The MP for Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber could only represent the area from Kinlochleven and below, she said. Any bid would require close collaboration with the MP for Inverness-shire and Wester Ross.
“In a perfect world, this shouldn’t matter,” said Ms Hendry, “but we have to face realities.”
She added that councillors would need a detailed map to know which MP to refer local issues to.
Conservative councillor Patrick Logue, for Wester Ross, Strathpeffer and Lochalsh, sought to remind the council that the Boundary Commission is non-partisan.
However, the chamber appeared in no mood to mince its words.
The main focus of councillors’ outrage is the division of existing communities.
Skye councillor John Finlayson said the people of Skye are being treated like “second class citizens” – subsumed into Inverness-shire and Wester Ross without so much as a name check.
Councillor Richard Gale, member for East Sutherland and Edderton, was one of the last members to speak. He blasted the proposals as just “a man with a map and a pen, drawing some pictures.”
Council officers now have the task of summarising councillors’ views in an official response to the Boundary Commission.
