Highland Council housing tenants facing four per cent rise in rent
Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.
Highland Council’s housing committee attracted heated debate today as members clashed over council house rent.
The administration strongly backed a below-inflation four per cent rise, saying they have to protect tenants in the cost-of-living crisis.
However, they admitted it would leave a shortfall in the budget for repairs and maintenance.
Opposition councillors mostly backed a higher increase, saying the housing service desperately needs investment.
One tenant representative spoke to the chamber, telling members she would rather pay more rent for a warmer home.
But the council’s official tenant consultation backed a three per cent rise.
Members all spoke about the need to strike the right balance, but repeatedly clashed over what that balance should be.
Ultimately, they agreed a four per cent increase which will cost the average council tenant an extra £3.20 per week.
This takes the average rent to £83.17 per week, compared with a Scottish average of £89.21.
‘We have an obligation to protect our tenants’
Highland Council's housing and property chairwoman Glynis Sinclair acknowledged that this was a tough decision for the council.
Because the housing revenue budget is funded by tenant rents, it needs to increase a little each year to maintain the service.
This year, anything under 5.2 per cent would mean a reduced budget for repairs and maintenance.
But the council leadership believes the cost-of-living crisis will make this a tough pill for tenants to swallow. Instead, the committee was asked to agree a smaller four per cent rise.
This leaves a £708,000 shortfall in the budget.
Highland Council leader Raymond Bremner told members every council is grappling with the same problem but added: “We have people on the breadline and we need to protect them.”
However, Councillor Andrew Jarvie said even seven per cent is below inflation, and not so extravagant that people would face any hardship.
Councillor Jarvie said the poorest people in Highland would be protected by increases in benefits.
He further accused the administration of courting positive headlines in the press.
On the contrary, Councillor Bremner said the council is listening to tenants’ views.
The council has consulted tenants on whether they would prefer a three per cent, five per cent or seven per cent rent increase. More than half opted for the smallest rise, and just 14 per cent said they could afford a seven per cent increase.
‘Four percent will not make me warmer’
Yet one tenant moved the chamber with her own account of the dilemma.
A representative of the tenant participation group whose name was not publicly disclosed told members she’d rather pay more for a warmer home.
She said she pays £253 a month just for electric heating in her one bedroom home, and while her thermostat is set to 21C, the actual temperature is as low as 14C.
She blamed poor insulation and ineffective heating systems.
And she said she’d pay an extra £5 a week if that would deliver the investment needed.
Opposition councillors agreed there was a strong case for investment.
Wick member Jan McEwan said “Twenty pounds a month isn’t going to hurt them.”
But others said every penny saved in rent is money that tenants can afford to spend on heating. The tenant survey appears to support that view.
Climate change chairman Karl Rosie responded to the discussion on insulation. “I understand it will cost half a billion pounds to bring our housing stock up to standard, so we need to be careful around any statement that £20 a month will do it.”
He added that the council needs to work to secure more external funding for insulation.
There was good news on that front, with housing boss David Goldie announcing that the council has secured £2.3 million from the Net Zero Carbon Challenge Fund.
Currently just seven per cent of Highland Council houses meet stringent national targets for energy efficiency.
Next year, they’re aiming to improve that to 49 per cent but it it means racking up more debt on the capital programme.
A stitch in time saves nine?
Ultimately, the members opposed to a four per cent rent increase believe Highland Council needs to make tough decisions now, to save money in future.
If tenants paid seven per cent or even 5.2 per cent, it would at least keep the service at its current spending levels.
As it is, this rent rise will mean scaling back on repairs and maintenance.
This will create a backlog and could lead to more problems down the line. Housing bosses confirmed they will need to prioritise essential repairs only and slash the budget for environmental improvements.
Councillor Sinclair agreed that the council can not keep the rents this low indefinitely but said they could manage it for one more year.
While the debate was extremely heated, the proposed four per cent increase went through without a vote.
Independent member Calum Munro summed up the discussion: “Two words that have come up a lot are balance and fairness,” he said. “The circumstances of all our tenants is different but there’s no doubt that these are challenging times for everyone.
“There will be a time to invest… but we have been brave and come to the right conclusion.”
