COUNCIL BUDGET: Highland councillors clash on spending on crumbling roads in region
Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.
Highland Council has voted through a budget that delivers an extra £14.1 million investment in roads repairs.
It will also see the creation of a new rapid response team which will provide quick pothole repairs across the region.
It was a rare bright spot in the gloomy Highland Council budget agreed yesterday during which councillors grappled over savings to meet a near £50 million shortfall.
Opposition members clashed over whether extra funding allocated for road repairs was enough.
The Liberal Democrats, Conservatives and some Independents proposed a joint amendment calling for more.
Meanwhile the Greens accused the council of abandoning its climate change goals by prioritising roads over active travel and energy saving.
Despite the controversy, the roads proposals were voted through.
‘Our communities want their roads fixed’
Opening the budget meeting, Highland Council leader Raymond Bremner (SNP) said the Highland people had made their priorities absolutely clear. They want their roads fixed.
As a result, the budget proposals focused on three main areas: protecting jobs, keeping the council tax rise affordable, and investing in roads.
At four per cent, the council tax rise is the lowest in Scotland, and the local authority has avoided making any compulsory redundancies.
It will shed up to 500 staff through retirements and the deletion of vacant posts.
And it has promised £12.8 million capital funding to undertake major repairs of the road network.
In addition, there will be a further £1.266 million for the new pothole team.
This takes the capital budget up to £20 million for the coming year for the road network maintained by the council.
However, opposition councillors say the figure is still 'woefully inadequate'.
The most recent data from the Scottish Road Maintenance Condition Survey put the total repair bill for Highland at an eye-watering £195 million. They say four in 10 Highlands roads need repaired.
Raid the piggy bank or ask the Scottish Government
How can Highland Council possibly catch up?
Members had different ideas. Opposition leader Alasdair Christie (Scottish Lib Dem) tabled an amendment that would put an extra £23 million into the capital budget for roads.
His amendment read: “The proposed spend on roads as detailed in the administration budget as a priority investment is woefully inadequate to keep pace with the deterioration and remedial works required.
“Noting that the council tax rise is 4%, we propose to allocate 3% towards meeting the budget gap and 1% to fund the loans charges, thereby allowing an extra £23 million of capital investment in our roads. This will cost £1.344 million in loan charges in 2023/24 and be funded by use of reserves.”
However, the administration argued it would not be prudent to dig deeper into reserves.
Councillor Christie had called the administration budget 'slash and burn' but Councillor Emma Knox (SNP) replied that the amendment is 'grab and dash'.
“This budget is not just for today,” said Councillor Knox. “It has to be sustainable and realistic.”
Councillor Christie himself acknowledged that the council reserves will hit zero by 2025/26 and negative numbers by 2026/27, unless drastic action is taken.
But he believes this year’s projected overspend will be far less than expected which would absorb the extra costs.
‘The public are watching’
Caithness councillor Matthew Reiss (Independent) picked up on that point, noting that finance boss Ed Foster said the Highland Council is not financially sustainable in the medium term.
Councillor Reiss argued that the council’s focus should be on Holyrood.
He said the Transport Minister Jenny Gilruth had refused to increase Highland roads funding, noting that all councils want more cash. “That impasse gives you a clear choice,” he said. “Meekly accept, or politely ask for a review of the funding formula. Rural authorities are very clearly losing out.”
Directly addressing the independent councillors who are part of the coalition administration he said: “It’s your choice. We are at a junction, if you like. The public are watching. Are you truly independent?”
But not all members wanted to find more money for roads.
The Greens acknowledged the need for greater investment but said the budget should do more for people, jobs and the climate.
Councillor Emma Willis accused the council of re-profiling climate action money to fund road repairs. “It does nothing to accelerate our response to the climate change crisis, which is incredibly sad,” she said. “Our 2019 declaration of a climate emergency is meaningless.”
Roads investment voted through
Under increasing pressure, the coalition administration stuck to its guns. They stressed that this was the most challenging budget for many years, dubbed 'a perfect storm' by Councillor Bremner.
He said the administration had reduced options to close the budget gap, and tough choices had to be made.
Councillor Ken Gowans said the delivery of extra cash for roads against a £50 million budget gap is “Not just remarkable, but sustainable, deliverable and desirable".
The administration budget won the vote 40-29 with two abstentions.
