Home   News   Article

Charges for public electrical charging points in Highlands to remain frozen for now


By Nicola Sinclair, Local Democracy Reporter

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!

Highland Council’s inaugural climate change committee has refused to approve massive price hike to its electrical vehicle (EV) charging points – for now

The local authority had proposed the significant rises in fees to use the facilities in a bid to offset maintenance costs.

While the current tariff for journey chargers is just 30p per kilowatt hour, the council suggested a steep increase to 86p.

This tariff is by far the most expensive in Scotland, and higher than private providers including BP.

However, members of the brand new climate change committee meeting in Inverness at headquarters earlier today refused to back the plan.

Instead, a motion from Conservative councillor Patrick Logue won unanimous support meaning the committee has deferred a decision on the 'extortionate' charges.

Members want more information about the maintenance costs of the charging points, which will fall to the council from next year.

Without that information, they say they can not be expected to make any recommendation about a sustainable pricing plan.

Councillor Logue warned that if the council sets the prices too high, it could derail its own targets to transition to EV vehicles.

That would be an ironic start for a committee tasked with taking the Highlands to net zero.

Why so high?

The big problem facing Highland Council is the cost of maintaining its EV units.

Currently, Transport Scotland manages the ongoing repair and maintenance of the EV infrastructure.

However, 20 of these units will become the council’s responsibility on 1 December this year. The rest will follow in 2023.

This leaves the council with a decision to make.

If it freezes the current 30 pence tariff, it will need to find an extra £227,000 to fund repair and maintenance – no small task for a council with a £40 million projected budget deficit.

This was the first option presented to the climate change committee.

Option two suggested increasing the tariff to 71p per kilowatt hour. This option would be cost neutral to the council.

However, officers recommended adopting option three – the highest rate of 86p – which would allow the council to reinvest in the network.

Climate committee chairman Karl Rosie moved the recommendation but did not find a seconder.

Instead, the committee voiced concern about the potential impact of the price hike.

‘This triples the cost of one of the key drivers of decarbonisation’

Conservative councillor Patrick Logue said that as an EV driver himself, he was 'absolutely astonished' at the proposals.

“This is not in line with other Scottish local authorities, this is by far the highest," he said. "The highest council at the moment is East Lothian Council charging 50p per kilowatt. What’s being proposed here is just under 75 per cent higher.

"It’s higher than the vast majority of tariffs being charged in the private sector.”

Councillor Logue highlighted that even the lower tariff, option two, is a higher unit price than fossil fuel vehicles.

All this, he said, could halt the momentum of EV take-up, which he said is currently only 0.78 per cent in the Highlands.

“This is the first meeting of the climate change committee, and one of the first things we’re being asked to do is to triple the cost of one of the key drivers of de-carbonisation,” he said. “Is that really the message we want to be sending out from this committee?”

Deferred decision may cost council

Councillor Logue’s comments won the support of Green councillor Kate Willis, who ultimately seconded his motion to defer a decision.

She agreed with council bosses that they cannot run EV charging at a loss.

However, she raised a chicken and egg dilemma – how can members agree a tariff when they do not know the expected cost of repair and maintenance?

Climate change officers said they are working on gathering that information now.

However, if the council did not apply the new tariff from next month it would start incurring costs.

Councillor Sarah Atkin warned 'putting it off will cost us'.

Nevertheless, members were not for budging.

They unanimously supported Councillor Logue’s call to defer.

While the climate change committee does not have the final say on anything financial, it has asked the economy committee to hold off on applying the tariff hike.

For Highland EV users, the tariff remains at 30p – but it could shoot up in the not too distant future.


Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More