Keepers demand input to protect human and deer welfare
Get the Strathspey Herald sent to your inbox every week and swipe through an exact replica of the day's newspaper
Following this morning’s publication of the Scottish Government’s response to the Deer Working Group Report, the British Association for Shooting and Conservation has warned of "worrying implications" that the government’s direction of travel could have for deer welfare.
A BASC spokesperson said the association had ‘grave concern’ about the Scottish Government’s direction of travel, and warned that seeking to normalise the culling of deer at night, shortening the close season for female deer and abolishing the close season for male deer could carry harmful animal welfare implications.
The deer working group report was submitted to the Scottish Government in December 2019, and contained 99 recommendations with the capacity fundamentally to change the way deer are managed in Scotland.
Over one year later, the Scottish Government has finally responded to the report and has accepted the majority of the group’s proposals in principle.
The multitude of recommendations cover the group’s extensive remit, and include proposals to: conduct trials with night sights without delay; repeal the prohibition on night sights subject to trial success; remove close seasons for all male deer; significantly shorten the close season for all female deer; end the use of lead bullets when shooting deer and replace the current Deer (Scotland) Act 1996 in its entirety.
BASC Scotland director Dr Colin Shedden said: “While there is much to be welcomed in the Scottish Government’s response to the deer working group report – particularly with respect to the movement away from lead bullets and a commitment to modernise the Deer (Scotland) Act – there are a number of areas which are a cause for grave concern.
“In particular, we are strongly opposed to the Scottish Government’s view that the close season for female deer should be kept under review, possibly with a view to being shortened in due course. We argue that such a move could result in the orphaning of dependent calves and kids, meaning many would die of starvation in the early Autumn.
"We are also concerned about the welfare implications - for both deer stalkers and the deer themselves - of culling heavily pregnant hinds and does in the spring.
“We do not accept that such an approach is in line with Scotland’s high standards of animal welfare, and we will be writing to Scotland’s newly established Animal Welfare Commission to make our concerns known on this matter. We would also like to remind the Scottish Government that Scotland’s deer are a natural asset, and we argue that they should be treated as such.
“In many situations local deer stalkers would be best placed to manage the ‘deer on their doorstep’ without having to resort to culling deer at night or when they have dependent offspring.”
Scottish Gamekeepers Association Chairman Alex Hogg, MBE, said: “Tax payer forestry and woodland schemes are installing Scotland’s next wealthy landlords. The direction is clear; iconic deer stand in the way. Wildlife and Green groups will be rejoicing.
“We need input on male and female deer seasons to ensure respect remains for the species and the deer managers doing the culling. Their mental welfare wasn’t considered by this report.
“Sanctioning night scopes for culls will be endorsing something illegal across much of Europe.
“Asking deer managers to cut large moving calves from the stomachs of pregnant hinds into mid-April must be off the table if Scottish Government wants to avoid public distaste.”